Topic summary
⁠19%2 analyzed articles/videos908 analyzed words
BS Summary: These New Businesses results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Halo Effect, and Framing Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 1,116 hits. Analysis detected 4,771 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,916 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠17% (13,893 of 16,562 topics). This New Businesses is better (less manipulative) than 83.90% of the peer group.
New Businesses
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 8,916
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

16% percentile
025507510016.1% percentile
1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 12.5%12.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos