Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These New Brunswick results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Appeal to Emotion, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 339 hits. Analysis detected 2,870 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,304 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 15,753 topics). This New Brunswick is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
New Brunswick
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,304
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.9%4.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 10.3%10.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.2%10.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.5%5.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.4%2.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.2%2.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos