Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These New Ballpark results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Halo Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 170 hits. Analysis detected 824 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,642 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This New Ballpark is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
New Ballpark
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,642
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 8.0%8.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.9%5.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 10.3%10.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 2.3%2.3%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 0.8%0.8%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 3.0%3.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 5.8%5.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 7.5%7.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 0.5%Halo Effect: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.0%Begging the Question: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos