Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Nesting Season results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Bandwagon, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 246 hits. Analysis detected 1,789 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,505 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 15,832 topics). This Nesting Season is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Nesting Season
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,505
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.8%9.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.1%5.1%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 6.8%6.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.1%2.1%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Bandwagon: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 2.2%Halo Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.9%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos