Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video660 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Neocolonialism results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 61.1% saturation with 1,209 hits. Analysis detected 5,313 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,980 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠91% (1,563 of 16,562 topics). This Neocolonialism is worse (more manipulative) than 90.60% of the peer group.
Neocolonialism
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,980
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

91% percentile
025507510090.6% percentile
8.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 61.1%61.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 17.8%17.8%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 14.4%14.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 12.1%12.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 17.9%17.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 26.2%26.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 8.8%8.8%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Topic 6.1%6.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 11.7%11.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Topic 61.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 26.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 18.7%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 17.9%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 17.8%, sitewide 4.6%Begging the Question: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 11.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 12.1%, sitewide 0.8%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 6.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 3.1%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Straw Man: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 0.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 2.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 3.7%Horn Effect: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 1.0%Bandwagon: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Tu Quoque: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos