Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,694 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Neighborhood Revitalization results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Pessimism Bias, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 466 hits. Analysis detected 3,789 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,776 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠19% (13,461 of 16,562 topics). This Neighborhood Revitalization is better (less manipulative) than 81.30% of the peer group.
Neighborhood Revitalization
Topic details
Total words: 6,776
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

19% percentile
025507510018.7% percentile
1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.4%5.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.9%6.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.1%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos