Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video53 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Negative results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Confirmation Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 33% saturation with 70 hits. Analysis detected 337 faulty-reasoning hits from 212 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 17.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠98% (334 of 16,562 topics). This Negative is worse (more manipulative) than 98.00% of the peer group.
Negative
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 212
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

98% percentile
025507510098.0% percentile
17.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles212 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 17.0%17.0%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Topic 17.0%17.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 17.0%17.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 16.0%16.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 17.0%17.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 17.0%17.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 33.0%33.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 8.0%8.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 17.0%17.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 33.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 17.0%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 17.0%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 17.0%, sitewide 7.5%Primacy Effect: Topic 17.0%, sitewide 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 17.0%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 17.0%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Topic 16.0%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 4.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos