Topic summary
⁠30%1 analyzed article/video1,656 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Near Death Experiences results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Anecdotal, and Overconfidence Bias, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 471 hits. Analysis detected 3,023 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,968 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠27% (12,217 of 16,562 topics). This Near Death Experiences is better (less manipulative) than 73.80% of the peer group.
Near Death Experiences
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠27%Near Death Experiences (selected)3%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 4,968
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

26% percentile
025507510026.2% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.8%1.8%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 5.2%5.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 4.6%Begging the Question: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Special Pleading: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.3%False Dilemma: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Middle Ground: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.8%Circular Reasoning: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.1%Personal Incredulity: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos