Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,404 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ncaa Volleyball results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Loss Aversion, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.5% saturation with 868 hits. Analysis detected 5,259 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,616 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (8,255 of 15,447 topics). This Ncaa Volleyball is better (less manipulative) than 53.40% of the peer group.
Ncaa Volleyball
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,616
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

47% percentile
025507510046.6% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.6%9.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 8.4%8.4%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 7.0%7.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 15.5%15.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 2.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 1.4%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos