Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Naval Blockades results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 390 hits. Analysis detected 3,169 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,264 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Naval Blockades is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Naval Blockades
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,264
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.9%11.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.9%6.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.0%3.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 8.0%8.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 3.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.8%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.4%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos