Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,384 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Native Plants results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 627 hits. Analysis detected 3,122 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,536 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠18% (13,696 of 16,562 topics). This Native Plants is better (less manipulative) than 82.70% of the peer group.
Native Plants
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,536
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

17% percentile
025507510017.3% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.7%3.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 11.3%11.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.8%0.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos