Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video901 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Native Americans results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Authority, and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.4% saturation with 809 hits. Analysis detected 2,973 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,604 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (7,615 of 16,559 topics). This Native Americans is worse (more manipulative) than 54.00% of the peer group.
Native Americans
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,604
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

54% percentile
025507510054.0% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 15.3%15.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.5%2.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.1%2.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.4%0.4%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 5.1%5.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 22.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Topic 15.3%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.8%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos