Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video227 analyzed words
BS Summary: These National Symbols results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Status Quo Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 20.3% saturation with 184 hits. Analysis detected 450 faulty-reasoning hits from 908 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠83% (2,849 of 16,562 topics). This National Symbols is worse (more manipulative) than 82.80% of the peer group.
National Symbols
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 908
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

83% percentile
025507510082.8% percentile
6.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles908 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 20.3%20.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.2%2.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.4%12.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.7%3.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.1%2.1%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 4.5%4.5%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 26.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 20.3%, sitewide 0.8%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos