Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These National Laboratories results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Halo Effect , and Anchoring Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 36.2% saturation with 628 hits . Analysis detected 2,101 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,737 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This National Laboratories is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. National Laboratories
Topic details
Total words: 1,737
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 36.1% 36.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 22.1% 22.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 6.9% 6.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Optimism Bias: Topic 36.1%, sitewide 6.0% Framing Effect: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 22.1%, sitewide 11.1% Negativity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 19.2% Halo Effect: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 7.5% Anchoring Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 6.9%, sitewide 0.8% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.5% Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.4% Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.3% Primacy Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst