Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video981 analyzed words
BS Summary: These National Days results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Anecdotal, and Optimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 277 hits. Analysis detected 2,126 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,924 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠19% (13,445 of 16,562 topics). This National Days is better (less manipulative) than 81.20% of the peer group.
National Days
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,924
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

19% percentile
025507510018.8% percentile
1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.1%7.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.6%2.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos