Topic summary
12% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,696 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nation State Actors results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Overconfidence Bias , and Representativeness Heuristic , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 417 hits . Analysis detected 2,650 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,088 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 21% (13,134 of 16,562 topics). This Nation State Actors is better (less manipulative) than 79.30% of the peer group. Nation State Actors
Topic details
Total words: 5,088
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.7% percentile 1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 8.2% 8.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Negativity Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst