Topic summary
12%2 analyzed articles/videos1,696 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nation State Actors results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Overconfidence Bias, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 417 hits. Analysis detected 2,650 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,088 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 21% (13,134 of 16,562 topics). This Nation State Actors is better (less manipulative) than 79.30% of the peer group.
Nation State Actors
Topic details
Total words: 5,088
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

21% percentile
025507510020.7% percentile
1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.0%2.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 8.2%8.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos