Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video379 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nassau County results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Fundamental Attribution Error, and In-Group Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 35.4% saturation with 403 hits. Analysis detected 2,847 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,137 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠94% (1,086 of 16,562 topics). This Nassau County is worse (more manipulative) than 93.40% of the peer group.
Nassau County
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,137
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

93% percentile
025507510093.4% percentile
10.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 29.5%29.5%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 23.9%23.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 35.4%35.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 21.0%21.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 15.1%15.1%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 11.0%11.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 17.8%17.8%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Topic 7.9%7.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 13.7%13.7%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Topic 7.9%7.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 35.4%, sitewide 19.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 29.5%, sitewide 3.3%Framing Effect: Topic 17.8%, sitewide 26.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 23.9%, sitewide 2.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 21.0%, sitewide 6.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 15.1%, sitewide 4.0%Halo Effect: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 9.1%Burden of Proof: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 0.4%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 8.1%Horn Effect: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 1.0%Primacy Effect: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 0.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 2.5%Red Herring: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%Special Pleading: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.8%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.3%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos