Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video696 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nasdaq 100 results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.6% saturation with 434 hits. Analysis detected 2,955 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,784 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (7,462 of 16,562 topics). This Nasdaq 100 is worse (more manipulative) than 54.90% of the peer group.
Nasdaq 100
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,784
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

55% percentile
025507510054.9% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.5%6.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.4%6.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 15.6%15.6%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 9.4%9.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.2%8.2%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 9.8%9.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 15.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 1.4%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos