Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video851 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nascar History results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Anecdotal, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 22% saturation with 560 hits. Analysis detected 4,101 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,551 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠81% (3,197 of 16,562 topics). This Nascar History is worse (more manipulative) than 80.70% of the peer group.
Nascar History
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,551
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

81% percentile
025507510080.7% percentile
5.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.5%5.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 21.9%21.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 14.8%14.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 10.9%10.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.6%7.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.2%0.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 10.6%10.6%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 4.7%4.7%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 3.3%3.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 26.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 21.9%, sitewide 9.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 20.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 16.1%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 11.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 6.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 6.0%Recency Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 4.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Personal Incredulity: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos