Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video573 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nascar Attendance results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Ad Hominem, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 26.2% saturation with 600 hits. Analysis detected 3,102 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,292 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠61% (6,217 of 15,780 topics). This Nascar Attendance is worse (more manipulative) than 60.60% of the peer group.
Nascar Attendance
Topic details
Total words: 2,292
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

61% percentile
025507510060.6% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 15.2%15.2%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 9.1%9.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 26.2%26.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 26.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 15.2%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 11.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 4.6%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.4%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos