Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video773 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nasa Ames results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Self-Serving Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 23% saturation with 710 hits. Analysis detected 1,969 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,092 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (7,071 of 16,562 topics). This Nasa Ames is worse (more manipulative) than 57.30% of the peer group.
Nasa Ames
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,092
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

57% percentile
025507510057.3% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.3%0.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 23.0%23.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.8%1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.8%4.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 23.0%, sitewide 6.0%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.8%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 3.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos