Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Narrative Structure results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 253 hits. Analysis detected 2,449 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,991 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Narrative Structure is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Narrative Structure
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
⁠0%Narrative Structure (selected)0%
Topic details
Total words: 2,991
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.9%6.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.1%6.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.3%7.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.2%4.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 5.0%5.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.4%Circular Reasoning: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.1%False Dilemma: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos

How to end a TV show⁠45%
The Verge⁠56%By Andrew Webster⁠0%6/29/2026, 5:00:00 AM