Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 687 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Narcotics results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Availability Heuristic , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.3% saturation with 584 hits . Analysis detected 3,121 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,748 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of 73% (4,539 of 16,562 topics). This Narcotics is worse (more manipulative) than 72.60% of the peer group. Narcotics
Topic details
Total words: 2,748
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
73% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 72.6% percentile 4.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 13.5% 13.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 12.6% 12.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 21.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Horn Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.0% Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.4% Begging the Question: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Burden of Proof: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst