Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video966 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Napping results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Hasty Generalization, and Indoctrination, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 5.5% saturation with 214 hits. Analysis detected 1,396 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,864 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 17% (13,765 of 16,562 topics). This Napping is better (less manipulative) than 83.10% of the peer group.
Napping
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,864
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

17% percentile
025507510016.9% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.5%2.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.4%2.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.5%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Composition/Division: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos