Topic summary
70% 1 analyzed article/video 637 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Name Change results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Confirmation Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 215 hits . Analysis detected 1,747 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,911 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 71% (4,807 of 16,562 topics). This Name Change is worse (more manipulative) than 71.00% of the peer group. Name Change
Topic details
Total words: 1,911
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
71% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 71.0% percentile 4.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 11.3% 11.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Topic 6.3% 6.3% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 6.5% 6.5% Circular Reasoning Sitewide 0.1% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Burden of Proof: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 0.4% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 5.3% False Dilemma: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.5% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 4.6% Status Quo Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Circular Reasoning: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Straw Man: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst