Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,509 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mystery Fiction results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Overconfidence Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 21.5% saturation with 974 hits . Analysis detected 4,726 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,527 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 71% (4,813 of 16,562 topics). This Mystery Fiction is worse (more manipulative) than 70.90% of the peer group. Mystery Fiction
Topic details
Total words: 4,527
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
71% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 70.9% percentile 4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.1% 7.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 11.4% 11.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 21.5% 21.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 11.5% 11.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 5.4% 5.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 8.2% 8.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 21.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 4.6% Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Horn Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst