Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video812 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Municipal Budget results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Hasty Generalization, and Anchoring Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 335 hits. Analysis detected 2,570 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,248 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (10,542 of 16,562 topics). This Municipal Budget is better (less manipulative) than 63.60% of the peer group.
Municipal Budget
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,248
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

36% percentile
025507510036.4% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.3%10.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.9%4.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 7.1%7.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.0%2.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.0%1.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%False Dilemma: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 1.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 4.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Loss Aversion: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 2.5%Recency Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Begging the Question: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Middle Ground: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos