Topic summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 41 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ms Now results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.8% saturation with 391 hits . Analysis detected 2,130 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,467 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 51% (8,266 of 16,562 topics). This Ms Now is worse (more manipulative) than 50.10% of the peer group. Ms Now
Topic details
Total words: 2,467
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
50% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 50.1% percentile 3.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 15.8% 15.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 13.1% 13.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 14.4% 14.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 15.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst