Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video713 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mrna Technology results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Authority, and Indoctrination, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 307 hits. Analysis detected 2,326 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,852 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 52% (8,090 of 16,562 topics). This Mrna Technology is worse (more manipulative) than 51.20% of the peer group.
Mrna Technology
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,852
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

51% percentile
025507510051.2% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.1%3.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.0%6.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 5.8%5.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 10.8%10.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.0%7.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.8%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 4.6%Begging the Question: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos