Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos540 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mount Everest results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 364 hits. Analysis detected 1,784 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,620 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠28% (11,238 of 15,435 topics). This Mount Everest is better (less manipulative) than 72.80% of the peer group.
Mount Everest
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,620
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

27% percentile
025507510027.2% percentile
2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.0%6.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.1%10.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.1%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Nature: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos