Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Moral Responsibility results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 18.5% saturation with 609 hits. Analysis detected 4,094 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,291 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Moral Responsibility is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Moral Responsibility
Topic details
Total words: 3,291
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 18.5%18.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 9.2%9.2%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 10.2%10.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.9%10.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.4%13.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.7%11.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 18.5%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.4%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%False Dilemma: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 6.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Begging the Question: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Straw Man: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Primacy Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos