Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Moral Issues results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Negativity Bias, and Indoctrination, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 23.5% saturation with 856 hits. Analysis detected 6,032 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,642 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 15,447 topics). This Moral Issues is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Moral Issues
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,642
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 21.7%21.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 23.5%23.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 11.4%11.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.1%12.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 7.1%7.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 26.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 23.5%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 21.7%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 1.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%False Dilemma: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 1.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.9%, sitewide 3.3%Begging the Question: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos