Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Moral Crisis results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 445 hits. Analysis detected 3,736 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,939 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Moral Crisis is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Moral Crisis
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,939
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.6%8.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.0%8.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 11.3%11.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.3%5.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 5.9%5.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 1.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Indoctrination: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Straw Man: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Circular Reasoning: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos