Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,276 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Modular Numpad results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 479 hits. Analysis detected 3,561 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,104 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠30% (11,618 of 16,562 topics). This Modular Numpad is better (less manipulative) than 70.10% of the peer group.
Modular Numpad
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠30%Modular Numpad (selected)3%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 5,104
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

30% percentile
025507510029.9% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.7%2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.9%4.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.1%1.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.2%0.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.4%9.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos