Topic summary
71% 1 analyzed article/video 1,162 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Moderate Politics results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 664 hits . Analysis detected 4,505 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,648 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 34% (10,465 of 15,689 topics). This Moderate Politics is better (less manipulative) than 66.70% of the peer group. Moderate Politics
Topic details
Total words: 4,648
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.3% percentile 2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 14.3% 14.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.7% 8.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.7% 7.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.0% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Slippery Slope: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.7% Bandwagon: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst