Topic summary
⁠31%1 analyzed article/video1,066 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Moda Center Controversy results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.8% saturation with 600 hits. Analysis detected 2,492 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,198 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠42% (9,627 of 16,562 topics). This Moda Center Controversy is better (less manipulative) than 58.10% of the peer group.
Moda Center Controversy
Topic details
Total words: 3,198
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

42% percentile
025507510041.9% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 18.8%18.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.7%7.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.1%0.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 6.1%6.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 18.8%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos