Topic summary
41% 1 analyzed article/video 796 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mls Match Recap results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 21.6% saturation with 517 hits . Analysis detected 2,053 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,388 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 66% (5,669 of 16,562 topics). This Mls Match Recap is worse (more manipulative) than 65.80% of the peer group. Mls Match Recap
Topic details
Total words: 2,388
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
66% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 65.8% percentile 3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.2% 7.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 21.6% 21.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.3% 8.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 11.6% 11.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 21.6%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 0.5% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.4% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst