Topic summary
42%1 analyzed article/video479 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Misused Mugshots results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Negativity Bias, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 20.3% saturation with 292 hits. Analysis detected 1,781 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,437 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.4% and a BS Rank of 79% (3,517 of 16,562 topics). This Misused Mugshots is worse (more manipulative) than 78.80% of the peer group.
Misused Mugshots
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,437
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

79% percentile
025507510078.8% percentile
5.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.2%10.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 20.3%20.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 11.8%11.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 10.4%10.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.8%11.8%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Topic 7.2%7.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.7%4.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 7.9%7.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 26.9%Anecdotal: Topic 20.3%, sitewide 5.2%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 15.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 0.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 7.5%Primacy Effect: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 0.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.5%Red Herring: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.4%Indoctrination: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos