Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video373 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Missouri Senate results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and In-Group Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 30% saturation with 334 hits. Analysis detected 2,438 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,114 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠91% (1,636 of 16,562 topics). This Missouri Senate is worse (more manipulative) than 90.10% of the peer group.
Missouri Senate
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,114
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

90% percentile
025507510090.1% percentile
8.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 15.5%15.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 19.6%19.6%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 12.0%12.0%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Topic 10.8%10.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 9.5%9.5%No True ScotsmanSitewide 0.1%Topic 7.2%7.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 21.1%21.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.7%2.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.7%6.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 30.0%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 21.1%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 20.8%, sitewide 19.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 19.6%, sitewide 6.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 15.5%, sitewide 1.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 9.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 8.1%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 1.4%False Dilemma: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 1.5%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%No True Scotsman: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 0.1%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 3.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 4.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 4.6%Red Herring: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 0.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.2%Straw Man: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos