Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,819 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Missouri Legislative Session results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 529 hits. Analysis detected 5,219 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,898 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (11,025 of 16,562 topics). This Missouri Legislative Session is better (less manipulative) than 66.60% of the peer group.
Missouri Legislative Session
Topic details
Total words: 6,898
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

33% percentile
025507510033.4% percentile
2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.7%7.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.3%5.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.9%5.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.5%2.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos