Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video718 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Missouri History results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Biased Writer Voice, and Indoctrination, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 255 hits. Analysis detected 1,702 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,872 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠25% (12,466 of 16,562 topics). This Missouri History is better (less manipulative) than 75.30% of the peer group.
Missouri History
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,872
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

25% percentile
025507510024.7% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.8%3.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 8.9%8.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.3%1.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 0.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos