Topic summary
⁠100%1 analyzed article/video1,051 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Minneapolis City Council results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Emotion, and Indoctrination, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 20.8% saturation with 656 hits. Analysis detected 6,251 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,153 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (3,408 of 16,562 topics). This Minneapolis City Council is worse (more manipulative) than 79.40% of the peer group.
Minneapolis City Council
Topic details
Total words: 3,153
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

79% percentile
025507510079.4% percentile
5.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 20.8%20.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.6%11.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 14.3%14.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 20.0%20.0%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 13.0%13.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.9%8.9%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 10.2%10.2%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Topic 8.7%8.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 11.3%11.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 20.8%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 20.0%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 17.1%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 1.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 9.1%Straw Man: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 0.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Begging the Question: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos