Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video99 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mine Ban Treaty results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Bandwagon, and Indoctrination, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 55.8% saturation with 221 hits. Analysis detected 768 faulty-reasoning hits from 396 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 21.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠99% (198 of 16,562 topics). This Mine Ban Treaty is worse (more manipulative) than 98.80% of the peer group.
Mine Ban Treaty
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 396
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

99% percentile
025507510098.8% percentile
21.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles396 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 55.8%55.8%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 31.1%31.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 36.1%36.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 21.7%21.7%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 14.1%14.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 17.2%17.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.8%3.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 10.3%10.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 55.8%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 36.1%, sitewide 11.1%Bandwagon: Topic 31.1%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 21.7%, sitewide 0.0%Halo Effect: Topic 17.2%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 14.1%, sitewide 2.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 6.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos