Topic summary
36%2 analyzed articles/videos788 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Military Training results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias, Optimism Bias, and Overconfidence Bias, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 349 hits. Analysis detected 2,183 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,705 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 36% (10,716 of 16,562 topics). This Military Training is better (less manipulative) than 64.70% of the peer group.
Military Training
Topic details
Total words: 3,705
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

35% percentile
025507510035.3% percentile
2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.9%1.9%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 7.2%7.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.5%1.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%Recency Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to Nature: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate