Topic summary
⁠92%1 analyzed article/video1,119 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Military Maneuvers results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Availability Heuristic, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.4% saturation with 552 hits. Analysis detected 3,900 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,357 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (6,290 of 16,562 topics). This Military Maneuvers is worse (more manipulative) than 62.00% of the peer group.
Military Maneuvers
Topic details
Total words: 3,357
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

62% percentile
025507510062.0% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.6%8.6%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 8.5%8.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.9%1.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 16.4%16.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 5.2%5.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 16.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 9.1%Recency Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 2.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.3%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.4%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos