Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video247 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Military Events results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Authority, and Halo Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 38.8% saturation with 383 hits. Analysis detected 1,039 faulty-reasoning hits from 988 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of 78% (3,694 of 16,562 topics). This Military Events is worse (more manipulative) than 77.70% of the peer group.
Military Events
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 988
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

78% percentile
025507510077.7% percentile
5.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles988 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 38.8%38.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.9%6.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.0%4.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 38.8%, sitewide 0.5%Framing Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.1%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.4%False Dilemma: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.5%No True Scotsman: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos