Topic summary
⁠28%1 analyzed article/video405 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Military Deaths results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, In-Group Bias, and Anecdotal, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 30.8% saturation with 374 hits. Analysis detected 904 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,215 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠85% (2,494 of 16,562 topics). This Military Deaths is worse (more manipulative) than 84.90% of the peer group.
Military Deaths
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,215
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

85% percentile
025507510084.9% percentile
6.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 30.8%30.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.3%3.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.6%2.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 3.8%3.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 3.8%3.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 14.7%14.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 6.6%6.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Halo Effect: Topic 30.8%, sitewide 6.7%Framing Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.5%Halo EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos