Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Migrants results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.5% saturation with 482 hits. Analysis detected 2,833 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,752 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Migrants is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Migrants
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,752
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 17.5%17.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.9%10.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.7%7.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.5%3.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.0%9.0%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 4.9%4.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 5.7%5.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 17.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.5%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos