Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video499 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michigan State Spartans results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and In-Group Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 44.3% saturation with 884 hits. Analysis detected 3,979 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,996 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (3,791 of 15,757 topics). This Michigan State Spartans is worse (more manipulative) than 75.90% of the peer group.
Michigan State Spartans
Topic details
Total words: 1,996
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

76% percentile
025507510075.9% percentile
5.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 44.3%44.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 28.1%28.1%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 10.0%10.0%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 9.3%9.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 25.2%25.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 6.2%6.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.3%3.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 44.3%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 28.1%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 25.2%, sitewide 19.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 6.9%False Dilemma: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 1.5%Slippery Slope: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 1.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.1%Special Pleading: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.3%Straw Man: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.9%Red Herring: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Composition/Division: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos