Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video2,940 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Jackson Biopic results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Halo Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 24% saturation with 2,822 hits. Analysis detected 12,751 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,760 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠38% (9,996 of 16,107 topics). This Michael Jackson Biopic is better (less manipulative) than 62.10% of the peer group.
Michael Jackson Biopic
Topic details
Total words: 11,760
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

38% percentile
025507510037.9% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles11.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.7%5.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 24.0%24.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.9%2.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.6%0.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 4.5%4.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 24.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 3.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 0.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos